awts.... may lumalabas nanaman balita.... "scripted" naman ngaun, first major rounds, dominating si pacman, tapos nung mga huli rounds na, style pagud paguran na, magpapatalo na, para kunwari nakaka points na si bradley?
impossible daw hndi maging aggresibo kahit sa huling rounds si pacman, hndi daw ganyan ang pacman na kilala nila...
awts, wag naman sana hehehe...
and that is why I was on Ariza's side when he was exposing Arum. pupusta ako si Arum nagpakana nung 'drama' sa camp ni pac kasi ineexpose siya ni Ariza. haha. D.o.m talaga yan si Arum, kumita yung kaibigan ko dati ng 7k dun sa pac-clottey fight, family friend sila ng isa sa mga tao sa camp ni pac, sabi nila pumusta daw kay pac, binayaran na daw si clottey na wag lumaban. haha. asan na si clottey ngayon? pinatahimik na ni Arum. hahaha.
That's the ugly side of sports in the US. Kung ang NBA nga nako-control pa ang outcome ng games because of betting odds boxing pa kaya? ANo na nangyari dun sa mga NBA refs na nag squeal regarding game fixing? Nawala ng parang bula.
Kaya rin siguro di matuloy tuloy ang Pac - FMJ fight kasi there's not much money to be made by the group that controls sports gambling. Sa pagpili pa lang ng underdog sa kanilang dalawa eh mahirap na tapos kung sino man ang underdog eh hindi significant ang odds dun sa fighter na yun. Baka malaki na ang +$100 definitely not worth it.
Sa MMA din naman same way of judging parang mas mahirap pa nga pero bihira yung mababalitaan mo na naging unfair yung decision kaya tuloy nasapawan nila yung boxing.
Basta ako WSM trip na trip ko panoorin siguradong walang dayaan! hahaha
hintayin ko nalang laban ni Donaire, atleast dun mataas chance na ma-knockout niya yung kalaban, unless his opponent pulls a clottey, just like what Vasquez did after a few rounds of trying to exchange with Donaire. haha.
either Arum rigged it or.. na-mafia sila? i've been seeing some articles lately that mentions somewhat of a huge influx of betting wages where put on Bradley winning a decision just hours before the fight, making it a 4-1 odd, rather than 5-1.. or even 3-1. either way, i'm done with this issue.
^Pero dami kasing gray area sa MMA kaya I would give them the benefit of the doubt. Di gaya sa boxing na talagang suntok lang pagbabasihan mahihirapan pa mag score mga judges???
Siguro shady ang mga decision sa MMA dahil masyadong maraming variables. Lalo na kung magkaiba yung discipline ng magkalaban at parehas may magagandang striking at ground game ang isang match.
Ito ang nahanap ko kay google:
Judging Criteria
1. Judges are required to determine the winner of a bout that goes to it's full time limit based upon the
following criteria:
-Clean Strikes
-Effective Grappling
-Octagon Control
-Effective Aggressiveness
F. Clean Strikes
1. The fighter who is landing both effective and efficient clean strikes.
2. There are two ways of measuring strikes:
-the total number of clean strikes landed (more efficient)
-the total number of heavy strikes landed (more effective)
G. The heavier striker who lands with efficiency, deserves more credit from the Judges than total
number landed.
1. If the striking power between the fighters was equal, then the total number landed would be used as the
criteria.
2. The total number of strikes landed, should be of sufficient quantity favoring a fighter, to earn a
winning round.
H. Strikes thrown from the top position of the guard, are generally heavier and more effective than
those thrown from the back.
1. Thus a Judge shall recognize that effective strikes thrown from the top guard position are of "higher quality",
than thrown from the bottom.
2. The Judge shall recognize that this is not always the case.
However, the vast majority of fighters prefer the top guard position to strike from. This is a strong
indication of positional dominance for striking.
I. Effective Grappling
1. The Judge shall recognize the value of both the clean takedown and active guard position.
2. The Judge shall recognize that a fighter who is able to cleanly takedown his opponent, is effectively
grappling.
3. A Judge shall recognize that a fighter on his back in an active guard position, can effectively grapple,
through execution of repeated threatening attempts at submission and reversal resulting in continuous
defense from the top fighter.
4. A Judge shall recognize that a fighter who maneuvers from guard to mount is effectively grappling.
5. A Judge shall recognize that the guard position alone shall be scored neutral or even, if none of the
preceding situations were met.(items 2-4)
6. A Judge shall recognize that if the fighters remain in guard the majority of a round with neither
fighter having an edge in clean striking or effective grappling, (items 2-4), the fighter who scored
the clean takedown deserves the round.
7. A clean reversal is equal to a clean takedown in effective grappling
J. Octagon Control
1. The fighter who is dictating the pace, place and position of the fight.
2. A striker who fends off a grappler's takedown attempt to remain standing and effectively strike is
octagon control.
3. A grappler who can takedown an effective standing striker to ground fight is octagon control.
4. The fighter on the ground who creates submission, mount or clean striking opportunities
K. Effective Aggressiveness
1. This simply means who is moving forward and finding success.(scoring)
2. Throwing a strike moving backwards is not as effective as a strike thrown moving forward.
3. Throwing strikes and not landing is not effective aggressiveness.
4. Moving forward and getting struck is not effective aggressiveness.
5. Shooting takedowns and getting countered and fended off is not effective aggressiveness.
Di ba ang dami, kaya mas mahirap husgahan ang MMA haha
ewan ko, for me kasi ufc 1 pa lang sa wowow napapanuod ko na highschool pa lang ako kaya medyo matagal tagal nako nakakanuod at alam ko kung sino lamang unless super close ung laban.
sa boxing naman kahit na suntok lang sa style naman nagkakatalo. @harley
Sayang yung UFC 148, Silva-Sonnen chaka Faber-Cruz sana, sobrang excited pa naman ako. biglang na-injured si Cruz, tas na-move yung laban ni Faber sa ibang card. >_>
Comments
impossible daw hndi maging aggresibo kahit sa huling rounds si pacman, hndi daw ganyan ang pacman na kilala nila...
awts, wag naman sana hehehe...
Kaya rin siguro di matuloy tuloy ang Pac - FMJ fight kasi there's not much money to be made by the group that controls sports gambling. Sa pagpili pa lang ng underdog sa kanilang dalawa eh mahirap na tapos kung sino man ang underdog eh hindi significant ang odds dun sa fighter na yun. Baka malaki na ang +$100 definitely not worth it.
Kaya top sport na sinusubaybayan ko ngayon eh football, FIFA, UEFA, English Premier League.
Basta ako WSM trip na trip ko panoorin siguradong walang dayaan! hahaha
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/boxing--pacquiao-bradley-arum-controvery-investigation-judge-duane-ford-.html
front lang yan, eh isa sa me pakana yang matandang yan eh.
pacman - asian
bradley - black
ford - black
ross - black
roth - white
referee- black
guess who wins!?
patiently waiting for the next ufc card.. :-D
Ngayon, it's all about the money baby!
Couture vs our very own "The Truth" vera
Shogun vs Rua 1
Grifiin vs Rampage 1
Shogun vs Machida perhaps? :P
well, speaking of Machida, Rampage-Machida decision was controversial too, parang nung Condit-Diaz lang, Aggression vs Striking.
Ito ang nahanap ko kay google:
Di ba ang dami, kaya mas mahirap husgahan ang MMA haha
sa boxing naman kahit na suntok lang sa style naman nagkakatalo.
@harley
lol shogun vs dragon my bad!
Yung re-match ni Sonnen at Silva!
Sayang yung UFC 148, Silva-Sonnen chaka Faber-Cruz sana, sobrang excited pa naman ako. biglang na-injured si Cruz, tas na-move yung laban ni Faber sa ibang card. >_>
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/sports/06/16/12/pacquiao-marquez-iv-gains-momentum
hahaha ayan nga po ba sir mighty, $$$ mabilisan, in 6mos. malinaw hehehe!
July 8, lapit na!